10 Reasons Why Boycotting Israeli Products Won't Work
Published March 05, 2009 @ 04:43AM PT
Boycotts have a long history. Union members refuse to purchase Hormell products. Jews avoid buying German cars. Homophobes say no to visiting Disney. The boycott is widely understood to be a form of economic pressure that forces the target to change behavior or suffer pain.
Of course, some things never get boycotted. For example, the environmental movement hasn't called on anyone to boycott coal power. Peta doesn't go after products from country X because they harm animals. (France - geese, Spain - bulls, etc.) For a boycott to be effective, the sponsor of the boycott needs a constituency large enough to make an impact, and be able to do so. When it comes to boycotting Israel though - the logic seems to fail. Here are ten concise reasons why boycotting Israel won't work.
- Israel does not export a great deal of clearly labeled consumer goods you can avoid buying.
- A boycott that appears to be working would generate a rise in purchases from supporters of Israel.
- Local struggles to boycott Israeli products have a history of failure when it comes time to vote.
- There isn't enough public sympathy with the Palestinian cause for a boycott to have an impact.
- The boycott movement has no serious celebrity spokespeople - and never will.
- The Palestinian Authority is not supporting a boycott. If the Palestinian government doesn't think this is important, can international activists say they know better?
- The purchasing power of progressives only works to promote, not to harm. Stick with fair trade people.
- The kinds of exports that really matter to Israel are in military defense, technology and business-to-business areas. These will never be affected by a consumer boycott.
- The boycott is too blunt a tool. Even people who support applying pressure on Israel for or against a specific action are often opposed to boycotting a country. It feels anti-Israel instead of pro-Palestinian.
- The language of the boycott campaign is almost entirely internal. A dialogue within the pro-Palestinian camp. There is no evidence that when faced with a choice, a significant community from the public at large while adhere to a boycott against Israel.
Note that this post is specifically about the boycott - not divestment or sanctions.
Of course, there are strategies for pressuring Israel or supporting Palestinians that DO have a track record of success. The problem is (for some) is that they focus on specific Israel behaviors, instead of carrying the subtext of being opposed to Israel's very existence. But that's for another post.
PS: I'm inviting anyone who wants to write a rebuttal to do so, on these pages. Tell us in ten brief points why you think a boycott will work (as opposed to why you think its the right thing to do) and it will come up as a guest post. If you don't see it - it means no one has bothered to write it.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
A New Israeli Website Asks: Who Profits From the Occupation?
-
Palestinian Mufti to Pope: Let's Unite Against the Jews
-
Regionalize the Conflict
Comments (64)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















I look forward to that "other post" about strategies that do have a track record of success. What is something that some of us can do, who are as far away as the US, that is effective? What about strategies (and I'm probing for myself here. Selfish - I know) that some of us who reside in rural areas can exercise who can't reach rallies, lobbies, and fundraisers which are common in urban areas like DC?
Posted by Jeremy Keith Hammond on 03/05/2009 @ 05:05AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree fully. Boycotting something that is hidden in plain sight cannot and will not work. There is a lot that everyday people like us cannot do because of economical or political barriers. In my opinion, the only real thing for us to do is to bug our reps and congressmen - at least, for a high school student that is all I can do.
Posted by Alexandra O'Donnell on 03/05/2009 @ 10:44AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I suppose another thing you could do is help spread awareness. Read up on issues. Become familiar with them - then spread the news to those your age. If anyone needs to be introduced to peace and non-violence as a method and not just the goal - it's youth like you. Good luck!
Posted by Jeremy Keith Hammond on 03/05/2009 @ 10:54AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
There really is no counterpoint to this, or at least 10 to warrant a post about it. The logicality of the boycott campaign is based purely on the tools that helped bring down Apartheid. It really is more of an awareness campaign and information because the details of the conflict is still rather furtive and hidden from the mainstream (or contrived).
But this campaign IS have its effects. Re: an article by Shiver Hever.
http://www.alternativenews.org/content/view/1605/381/
Posted by Joshua Alzona on 03/05/2009 @ 04:15PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
1- any product with a barcode tag is identified. Barcode starting with (left most) 729 are Israeli.
2- The purpose of a boycott is not only economic pressure but also education of the public.
3- boycott does not target consumer products only but extends to cultural, academic and sports. It also includes a call for divestment from all companies Israeli or not which benefit from and support the occupation. It also includes the call for imposing sanctions on Israel until it abides by international law and respects human rights.
4- Over a hundred Palestinian civil society organizations (trade unions, women organizations, health care professionals, farmers organizations, etc..) called and endorsed the call for boycott. Your darling PA is not the only game in town.
5- while a popular boycott cannot necessarily affect the military industrial complex, a wide boycott movement can and will produce pressure on governments to reconsider. Examples are the suspension of special status trade partner by the EU following the mass protests during the Gaza massacre.
6- The calls for boycott have been very effective in isolating South Africa during the Apartheid regime and there is no reason to think that they can't in the case of Israel.
7- As to celebrity support: "build it and they will come". Celebrities--most of them at least--are a group of opportunists that will endorse any cause they think will further their careers.
8- In the eighties, when I came to the US, the "progressives" would not talk about Palestine and would not--except for a few--declare support for the Palestinian struggle (too hot of a potato). I hate to break it to you but things are not static and will change.
8- You can say the glass is half full or half empty. The boycott movement is not anti-Israel (or anti-semitic which is the hidden implication). The boycott is to force the Israeli government to change its policies vis-a-vis the Palestinians through pressure from within and from the outside.
9- Boycott of Israeli goods especially in the occupied territories has the effect of promoting local and indigenous economy and severing the dependence on Israeli goods.
10- I would suggest throwing a pebble in a pond and sit to watch the ripples grow and spread. A boycott movement maybe small now but, just like in the case of South Africa, it will grow to become a wide, strong and popular movement.
Many so called and self described "progressives" oppose boycott. There maybe many reasons for that among which is the fear that a popular boycott will expose them for the fraud they are. Progrssive is a relative measure, keep that in mind. Liberal Zionists are Zionists first in the sense that they are committed to the zionist ideology and to its product the state of Israel. When it comes to Israel they are nationalists and therefore will oppose any move they see as harming the national interest of Israel especially if this comes from the outside beyond their own initiative and control.
Posted by A N on 03/06/2009 @ 05:01AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Areft, this is a great list. I wonder though what you have left if you rip in two, with some items saying why this is moral/important, and the other with arguments for why it is likely to be effective right now (or not.)
My experience is that the pro-Palestinian activists want to talk about the moral imperative, but not so much the effectiveness of this strategy when compared to others. Just saying 'South Africa' isn't really enough.
Posted by Charles Lenchner on 03/06/2009 @ 09:33AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I don't believe that I said why there should be a boycott--or as you say the moral imperative. What I wrote is really a list to counter what you wrote. There maybe different strategies and some are certainly more effective than others but I would not discount boycott just because it is a small movement now or looking at the US as a sampling of what the rest of the world thinks and does.
Posted by A N on 03/06/2009 @ 10:32AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
BDS is beginning to have an effect. Read this article in the AIC http://www.alternativenews.org/content/view/1605/381/
Maybe you have read it already and your list is a response?
Posted by A N on 03/07/2009 @ 05:22AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
How about having Hamas recognize Israel's right to exist, renounce violence, and stop firing rockets at Israeli civilians.
Israel is far from perfect and there are many things she does that I don't agree with, but when "progressives" or anyone else ignores their side of the story, it doesn't help anything.
Posted by Owen L. on 03/06/2009 @ 06:49AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
There is no smoke without a fire. History does not start when Israel is attacked just remember that.
Having said that, there is no justification for attcking and killing civilians no matter who is the perpetrator is.
Posted by A N on 03/06/2009 @ 07:23AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
There is lots of smoke without fire. You need only a little heat...or a government. How far back in history shall we go go with this question? A hundred years...a thousand, four thousand?
The UN decided on Israels existence as well as Jordan's (Western Palestine). Is there anyone out there who really believes this constant killing would continue IF the Palestinians put their knives away? That it won't stop if the Israels cease is a fact proved many times. The Muslim extremest want this to continue and so it will.
Posted by James Thompson on 03/07/2009 @ 10:59AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Israel ban sale of pistachio nuts and US ban export from Cuba
Posted by Pyle Bopkas on 03/06/2009 @ 11:03AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
OK. So I understand that you are ticked off at Israel, and in love with the Palestinians. That's fine with me, as long as you have truly weighed up all the facts. So, you want to boycott Israel? I'll be sorry to miss you, but if you are doing it - do it properly. Let me help you.
Check all your medications. Make sure that you do not have tablets, drops, lotions, etc., made by Abic or Teva. It may mean that you will suffer from colds and flu this winter but, hey, that's a small price for you to pay in your campaign against Israel, isn't it? While we are on the subject of your Israeli boycott, and the medical contributions to the world made by Israeli doctors and scientists, how about telling everyone to boycott the following: An Israeli company has developed a simple blood test that distinguishes between mild and more severe cases of Multiple Sclerosis. So, if you know anyone suffering from MS, tell them to ignore the Israeli patent that may, more accurately, diagnose their symptoms. An Israeli-made device helps restore the use of paralyzed hands. This device electrically stimulates the hand muscles, providing hope to millions of stroke sufferers and victims of spinal injuries. If you wish to remove this hope of a better quality of life to these people, go ahead and boycott Israel. Young children with breathing problems will soon be sleeping more soundly, thanks to a new Israeli device called the Child Hood. This innovation replaces the inhalation mask with an improved drug delivery system that provides relief for child and parent. Please tell anxious mothers that they shouldn't use this device because of your passionate cause. These are just a few examples of how people have benefited medically from the Israeli know-how you wish to block. Boycotts often affect research. A new research center in Israel hopes to throw light on brain disorders such as depression and Alzheimer's disease. The Joseph Sangol Neuroscience Center in the Sheba Medical Center at Tel HaShomer Hospital, aims to bring thousands of scientists and doctors to focus on brain research. A researcher at Israel's Ben Gurion University has succeeded in creating human monoclonal antibodies which can neutralize the highly contagious smallpox virus without inducing the dangerous side effects of the existing vaccine.
Two Israelis received the 2004 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Doctors Ciechanover and Hershko's research and discovery of one of the human cells most important cyclical processes will lead the way to DNA repair, control of newly produced proteins, and immune defense systems. The Movement Disorder Surgery program at Israel's Hadassah Medical Center has successfully eliminated the physical manifestations of Parkinson's disease in a select group of patients with a deep brain stimulation technique. For women who undergo hysterectomies each year for the treatment of uterine fibroids, the development in Israel of the Ex Ablate 2000 System is a welcome breakthrough, offering a noninvasive alternative to surgery. Israel is developing a nose drop that will provide a five year flu vaccine. These are just a few of the projects that you can help stop with your Israeli boycott. But let's not get too obsessed with my ducal research. There are other ways you can make a personal sacrifice with your anti-Israel boycott. Most of Windows operating systems were developed by Microsoft-Israel. So, set a personal example. Throw away your computer! Computers should have a sign attached saying Israel Inside. The Pentium NMX Chip technology was designed at Intel in Israel. Both the Pentium 4 microprocessor and the Centrum processor were entirely designed, developed, and produced in Israel. Voice mail technology was developed in Israel. The technology for the AOL Instant Messenger ICQ was developed in 1996 in Israel by four young Israeli whiz kids. Both Microsoft and Cisco built their only R. & D. facilities outside the US in Israel. So, due to your complete boycott of anything Israeli, you now have poor health and no computer. But your bad news does not end there. Get rid of your cellular phone. Cell phone technology was also developed in Israel by Motorola which has its biggest development center in Israel. Most of the latest technology in your mobile phone was developed by Israeli scientists.
Feeling unsettled? You should be. Part of your personal security rests with Israeli inventiveness, borne out of our urgent necessity to protect and defend our lives from the terrorists you support. A phone can remotely activate a bomb, or be used for tactical communications by terrorists, bank robbers, or hostage-takers. It is vital that official security and law enforcement authorities have access to cellular jamming and detection solutions. Enter Israel's Net line Communications Technologies with their security expertise to help the fight against terror. A joint, nonprofit, venture between Israel and Maryland resulted in a 5 day Business Development and Planning Conference March of 2006. Elected Israeli companies will partner with Maryland firms to provide innovation to the US need for homeland security. I also want you to know that Israel has the highest ratio of university degrees to the population in the world. Israel produces more scientific papers per capita - 109 per 10,000 - than any other nation. Israel has the highest number of startup companies per rata. In absolute terms, Israel has the highest number, except the US. Israel has the highest concentration of hi-tech companies outside of Silicon Valley. Israel is ranked #2 in the world for venture capital funds, behind the USA. Israel has more museums per capita. Israel has the second highest publication of new books per capita. Relative to population, Israel is the largest immigrant-absorbing nation on earth. These immigrants come in search of democracy, religious freedom or expression, economic opportunity, and quality of life. Believe it or not, Israel is the only country in the world which had a net gain in the number of trees in 2005. Even Warren Buffet of Berkshire-Hathaway fame has invested billions with Israeli Companies. So, you can vilify and demonize the State of Israel. You can continue your short-sighted boycott, if you wish. But you must consider the consequences, and the truth. Think of the massive contribution that Israel is giving to the world, including the Palestinians - and to you - in science, medicine, communications, security. Pro rata for population Israelis are making a greater contribution than any other nation on earth
Posted by Daniel Katzen on 03/06/2009 @ 11:59AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Where would the world be without Israel? In the Middle ages maybe? Or maybe the stone age? Without all those medical advances thanks to Israeli innovation and ingenuity people would be dropping like flies--I am sorry I did not realize that I suppose I must have been living in a different world until I happened to land on this piece of nationalist PR and propaganda.
Thanks for the advice though I will take them into consideration.
Posted by A N on 03/06/2009 @ 02:23PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hi aref,
When you do not like what is said you use the same standard line "propaganda".
As one of my favorite Hollywood actors once said in one of his movies when being interrogated on a witness stand. "You want the truth, You can't handle the truth". I must admit that goes for a bunch of you Israel bashers on this site. I find it interesting that there is not ONE single country besides Israel you waste so much time on trying to destroy in some way or fashion.
I can think of a few countries in the world that if they disappeared today it would be no great loss to the well being of the world. But as Daniel Katzen so eloquently stated without Israeli ingenuity you most probably would still be lighting fires with a flint stone. LOL
Posted by s o on 03/07/2009 @ 05:29AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Yup. Not just me though. It seems that Israel taught the whole world how to light a fire other than with flint stones. Quite remarkable and it certainly is not propaganda. Everybody should know that. Where have we been? !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by A N on 03/07/2009 @ 07:11AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Well, as to the computer thing, you could always go with Apple...last I checked, Macintosh was entirely US-developed.
Posted by William Feagin on 03/07/2009 @ 08:01AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I think that they are also using the intel dual core for windows compatibility?
Posted by s o on 03/07/2009 @ 08:10AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The effect fo giving up the Israeli products you tout will be small compared the the possible gains of making the world aware of the Crimes Against Humanity committed by Israel.
In N. America we have a corporate media that covers up Israeli crimes of murder of civilians, destruction of civilian infrastructure, torture of prisoners, collective punishment of the entire population of Gaza and severe restrictions on the population of the West Bank; e.g., a recent report found that 29 West Bank women were forced to give birth at check points, held up deliberately by the IDF. A boycot campaign begins by informing people, then it moves to effective ecenomic action.
Posted by Edwin Daniel on 03/07/2009 @ 10:32AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I think you were spot on, Daniel! I am Jewish and have a love of Israel like no other in my life (except for G-d). Israel is not the culprit in the mix. It only wants to live in a peaceful way with the rest of the world. However, in order to secure its boundaries and protect its citizens, it must use military force to do so. I have visited Israel a few times and I can tell you that Israel is one of the most amazing places I could imagine. Most people there eat a healthy diet (did not see the overwhelming avalanche of obesity that we see here in the US), worship abundantly, respect the land, and more. It's the terrorist actions that befell the nation that cause them to put into place the necessity to retaliate. For those who think that Israel is the culprit, think again. Since 9/11, aren't we more hypervigilent about protecting our borders? I say, yes! When one is personally being oppressed or attacked, one stands up and fights instead of getting pummeled. If there is to truly be a lasting peace, then the Arab faction needs to lay their weapons down for good. When this happens, serenity will prevail. And, that is the way to effect change in the world. Think of the Markham poem:
"He drew a circle that shut me out, Heretic, rebel a think to flout; but love and I had the whit to win, we drew a circle that took him in." Enough said?
Posted by Lainey Millen on 03/07/2009 @ 11:44AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
So I suppose the war with Nazi Germany was a mistake? Their scientists advanced science and technology (and a lot of them were brought here to the US after the war). I guess history will judge the US and the Allies very harshly for all the scienctific advances the world has forfeited by WWII.
tsk, tsk, and all this time we've been calling them the greatest generation. Perhaps Nazi scientists would've given us a cure for cancer by now. Bummer.
Posted by Sam Dor on 03/06/2009 @ 04:48PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Yup Sam,
By george you got it. Your comment certainly clarifies this attempt at diminishing Israeli innovation and positive achievenessit it offers the world. But hey their just Jews/Israelis and there just worthless sub-human beings. Pathetic.
Posted by s o on 03/07/2009 @ 05:34AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Mr. Katzen,
How many Palestinians are welcomed in these museums, how many are given access to these medical breakthroughs, and how many have enough income to even own computers? Your Israeli marvels are shared very selectively. Only some immigrants are welcomed-those who share your religion. Native-born Palestinians are viewed as second-class humans. All the nifty technology in the world will not atone for Israel's occupation of another people.
Posted by J T on 03/06/2009 @ 05:53PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
JT, are you from the Middle East? You seem to "know" a lot about it.... Second class citizenship can be seen in Arabia, JT, if you really cared to look for it. Heck, look at the Sudan. Do you think these women are being raped and mutilated for any other reason than they are not Muslim men?
I would like to see 10 reasons for calling Israel an Apartheid state. Heck, if what Israel is doing so disgusting to people, shouldn't those people come up with some other name for what Israel is doing? Apartheid is Afrikaan. Give me some Hebrew. Something in Arabic, like Nakba. Which reminds me: Why is it that the Arabs see a great catastrophe when the Jews see a great chance?
But I digress. A list of 10 point-to-point comparisons of how Israel is an Apartheid state, and then you can talk to me about boycotting our oranges (but not the penecillian).
And remember: Palestinian protesters chanting "Death to Israel" aren't peace activists.
Posted by A BG on 03/06/2009 @ 06:33PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
A BG,
If you have to ask then you really have no idea what goes in this amazing country. On the beaches of Tel Aviv Israeli-Arabs are part of the mix of people enjoying the sun and water. They have FULL access to the museums, streets , and HOSPITALS. It is a bit sad that you have been buying into radical Left-wing propaganda. My goodness get your body over here I will be more then happy to show you around.
In spite of Israeli shortcomings in a variety of venues it is basically a decent place with decent people. When there is an opportunity to stop the Hamas/Iran axis of death then maybe we can have a chance for a peaceful settlement.
Posted by s o on 03/07/2009 @ 05:43AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Instead of focusing on pressuring Israel, how about a focus on helping the Palestinians, perhaps, by buying their products? Then there would be no question about your motives since your actions would be to directly help someone rather than to pressure or punish. This action would also provide the Palestinians with an opportunity to improve themselves in peaceful ways by improving and expanding their products.
One might also buy products made by Israeli Arabs to help them improve their condition.
Posted by Martin Greenstein on 03/06/2009 @ 09:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
That's a good suggestion Martin. It would probably help a lot. But it would still be necessary to find a way to pressure Israel to allow flow of products in and out of Palestine. Does somebody have a suggestion for that?
Until then, it looks like Mr. Katzen has made a good list of potential boycott items for the boycotters to work on.
Posted by Gladys Tiffany on 03/06/2009 @ 11:15PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"It would probably help a lot. But it would still be necessary to find a way to pressure Israel to allow flow of products in and out of Palestine. Does somebody have a suggestion for that?"
The Gazan government could stop shooting missiles into Israel. 8 years later, Gladys, and I don't think Hamas has accomplished much through this tactic. Except, of course, bad PR for Israel. And apparently this suffocating blockade.
Posted by A BG on 03/07/2009 @ 05:46AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hi Gladys,
There is a flow of goods and services taking place in Gaza. The problem is the constant barrage of rockets by Hamas designed to curtail an open flow of goods into and out of Gaza from Israeli border crossings. The day that there is quiet Hamas loses its armed struggle and Iran stops funding this terror organization. Their priority is for the destruction of Israel and that is not going to happen. Not by them at least.
Posted by s o on 03/07/2009 @ 05:50AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Unfortunately, the "flow" of goods into Gaza is actually a "trickle" of goods. The flow if information out of Gaza isn't nearly as slow as the flow of goods. The dire situation there is a perfect breeding ground for desperate people to be forced into desperate activity like bombing. If Israel really wants to resolve it's border and live in peace, it would handle the borders with Palestine in a much different way.
Posted by Gladys Tiffany on 03/07/2009 @ 07:50AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
What is a "trickle" of goods? The flow of information out of Gaza is controlled by Hamas.
I would like to advise you that according to the "experts" on terror the folks that are used for human bombings are middle-class kids, women, children and young men in trouble with the authorities and just unstable and bribed youth. This is your army of "resentment".
The people in Gaza are being constantly intimidated by Hamas and other terror groups. This information is constantly being leaked out.
I am just baffled where you get your information from. It appears to be at odds with the reality on the ground.
You want Israel to allow the unhindered flow of goods and smuggled arms into Gaza to please your sensibilities? I think not. Not until the rockets stop and the release of Galid Shalit.
Posted by s o on 03/07/2009 @ 08:07AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Boycotting consumer goods made in Israel is not likely to have the effect we'd like it to have--I agree that most people wouldn't really know which products they had that were made in Israel without looking closely at the manufacturing tags. I have several pairs of boxer briefs made there, but I usually don't think to look all that closely at the tags unless I'm REALLY bored. I don't have the time to get outraged over little details like that.
No, if we're to boycott Israel, we should deny them tourism dollars. That would have a much greater effect, I think; if nobody visits there, you'd see their service industries (restaurants, hotels, tourist destinations of all kinds) begin to suffer significantly.
Posted by William Feagin on 03/07/2009 @ 08:21AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
My heart is heavy and my blood boils when I think about the killing and destruction in Gaza. How can you compare the ineffective home made rockets coming out of Gaza to the state of the art missiles Israel uses to kill thousands of Gaza civilians in the hopes that along with the women, children, and old people in the buildings they destroy, some Hamas leaders will also be assassinated?
A consumer boycott will not stop the billions of taxpayer dollars that our government gives to Israel, nor the billions in arms trade that make up the biggest part of the Israel economy. If the people of the US want to influence Israel's treatment of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, the territories Israel captured using US military aid, we need to get our representatives to tie humane treatment of Palestinians to US aid to Israel. Our government could also back the prosecution of Israeli leaders responsible for atrocities of the Gaza invasion for war crimes. Before threatening to bomb Iran for suspected development of nuclear capability, President Obama needs to acknowledge the elephant standing in the middle of the living room, Israel's nuclear arsenal that the US helped them acquire which is driving the nuclear arms movement in the middle East.
Posted by Paco Despacio on 03/07/2009 @ 08:37AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Comments comparing types of weaponry have always bothered me. They bother me because in reality knives, bullets, low-tech rockets and hi-tech bombs all kill equally well. Dead is dead. The only important point to focus on in my opinion is what was the motive for taking another human being's life?
Posted by Dan J on 03/07/2009 @ 09:25AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hi Paco,
Much of your economic analysis is just not factually correct. I understand that you are among the Israel haters and believe that Israel is evil incarnate. But hey I got a bridge in Brooklyn I would love to sell you.
Posted by s o on 03/07/2009 @ 02:48PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hi Steve,Your understanding that I am an Israel hater is something you made up. I wish for the people of Israel to live in peace and security with mutual respect and cooperation with their neighbors. Sell your Brooklyn bridge to someone who believes your rhetoric about the mideast.Many of the posts I am reading on this topic can be summarized to read "My side is right and your side is wrong. My side represents good people and your side represents insane, immoral, killer animals. If you criticize the actions of people on my side you hate all my people. The killing of my people is evil and the killing of your people is justified."This is the rhetoric of war. How much peace and security has it brought anyone? Do Israelis and Palestinians feel safer after all the killing?I stand with the Israelis and Palestinians who declare that military strategies are taking us further from a peaceful solution. I support those who are willing to enter a sincere dialogue about peace despite the intimidation they receive from the war profiteers minions, the militant religious fanatics. and the political opportunists in their governments.Being right and making your opponent wrong is a sad booby prize as long as the killing etc. continues.
Posted by Paco Despacio on 03/08/2009 @ 09:10AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
PS. Steve, are you in the United States or Israel? I have some cousins on my father's father's side named Ornstein in the Cleveland area.
Posted by Paco Despacio on 03/08/2009 @ 09:19AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
What this forgot to mention is the othet two components of the trinity: divestment and sanctions. The call for boycott is also a call for divestment of companies benefitting and/or supporting the Israeli occupation and the Israeli violations of human rights and international law. It is also a call on governments and particularly the US to impose sanctions on Israel.
We have been given here a synposis of how advanced Israel is, yet despite this and its standard of living comparable to many european countries, Israel is the largest recepient of US "aid" to the tune of $3-5 billion a year with no strings attached.
Posted by A N on 03/07/2009 @ 09:10AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Good grief. For all the comments praising Israel for it's grand medical advances and civilized sensibilities - thank you - we always need reminders that people are still human and have good sides. (Aref, I know you're angry, but I hope that you recognize that some of this good about Israel is true.) However, this doesn't mean we can't condemn Israel or its military and civillian supporters of the violence committed on Palestinians. Saving one life today does not mean I can get away with taking another life tomorrow. Likewise, when "punishing" one for their crimes today - we can't forget the positives they've contributed. No one is absolutely evil, no one is absolutely good - the same goes for nations/groups.
Now the defensive posture by Israeli apologists (such as those who comment here in these threads) illustrates either (1) blindness/denial of one's own faults, or (2) a conscious and deliberate attempt to white-wash wrong-doings. By all means, remind us how great Israel is - because it's true, but you can't use that as an argument to justify what is going on in Gaza and West Bank.
This duality of good and evil is also true for Palestinians/Gazans. You cannot wipe out Gaza because of the acts of a few terrorists. You cannot brush off innocent/civillian casualties as "just accidents" or blame it on themselves. These people aren't "evil." Because they have a piece of paper that says Israel should not exist - does not mean they're not capable of love and creation - or even peace. Because a small number of lost souls have given up their lives to blow up a bus or cafe in Israel, does not mean that all the others who are being bombed in Gaza are also lost!
As for boycotting, I don't know how I feel about it yet. If the target of the boycotte could specifically be the corporations that are benefitting from this war - great. But corporations, as entities, are inherently profit driven (err... greedy) and any costs they suffered would put innocents in economic danger. It means a few janitors and other low level employees - some even oblivious to what their company is doing - will lose their jobs and livelyhoods. The poor of Israel will suffer before the rich elite will who support or even incite this war. It's just another form of violence. It will be easier for those low lvl employees to blame outsiders for the boycotte that cost them their job than to look inward and wonder why we've chosen to do this to them - especially with a continually rich elite influencing them. ("We have to cut jobs because the Gazans, the terrorists - in their manipulating ways - have gotten other countries to boycotte us." etc.. etc..)
So - if we could target the war-profiteering corporations themselves, great! But corporations will put profits first and innocents will suffer and the cycle of violence will continue.
Education and nurturing empathy, especially among youth, is the route I would endorse.
Posted by Jeremy Keith Hammond on 03/07/2009 @ 09:21AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Jeremy, I am not angry. I do recognize the achievements and contributions of Israeli academics, intellectuals and artists. There is no denying that those individuals have made great and unique contributions to their respective fields. My sarcasm here should not be construed as diminishing those contributions but should be understood in the context of a response to the apologists who trumpet those contributions as a means to justify the unjustifiable like you correctly point out.
Some cannot seem to distinguish between individuals, institutions and state. The calls for boycott should never be understood as targetting individuals as such or because who they are. The boycott is that of institutions and of a state system as instruments of oppression. Yes individuals could be hurt as a result but the hope is that those individuals begin to ask questions and see beyond the propaganda and brainwashing and then become agents of change.
Profitting from the oppression of others should never be allowed to take place and that is what this BDS movement is all about. Of course those who benefit from the status quo and justify the oppression of others will oppose the boycott. Other opponents maybe motivated by more noble motives but there is no denying that faced with the inaction and the support that is granted to Israel by western governments those of us who want an end to the oppression and the occupation have little choice if we want to engage in non-violent action to raise awareness and generate debate and questionning among the public.
Posted by A N on 03/07/2009 @ 11:03AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Jeremy,
"Now the defensive posture by Israeli apologists (such as those who comment here in these threads) illustrates either (1) blindness/denial of ones own faults, or (2) a conscious and deliberate attempt to white-wash wrong-doings."
I think that this is where you fall into the trap of, if they do not support what I believe then they must be apologists. This is nonsense. Just because we see the other side and also live in the region and do not agree with your analysis doesn't mean we are not correct.
You have your right to blame Israel all you want. But the facts on the ground just don't bare out your trivialization of a serious situation for the citizens of Israel. Terror is terror and paid for by Iran. Chaos is the operative word in this part of the region. Peace is the one element that Hamas/Iran axis is terrified of. The moment that will happen their reason to exist will no longer be an issue. Iran will have lost and Hamas support will have been eliminated.
But then again their is no real incentive for peace when the EU and the US is willing to throw money at the situation. Why is there a need to create a State with the need to be accountable when all you need is to cry "victim" and receive billions for their personal coffers. Not a bad deal.
Posted by s o on 03/07/2009 @ 03:02PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"I think that this is where you fall into the trap of, if they do not support what I believe then they must be apologists. This is nonsense. Just because we see the other side and also live in the region and do not agree with your analysis doesn't mean we are not correct."
Seeing the Israeli side of this argument alone is exactly why some may have (emphasis on the may - I'm not saying it's definite, but it's a trend) may have a skewed vantage point that affects their judgement. While being close to the action does give one some benefit when trying to analyze the situation - it also has a blinding affect. Like trying to see the forest from the trees.
Now my problem with your argument isn't the fact that you're Israeli - I never said that is the reason you're wrong. How I know you're wrong is by your descriptions of Gazans/Palestinians. Saying that they are "afraid of peace" and agents of chaos is just discriminatory and false. While many are scary and have committed crimes - this does not mean it's an inherent trait in all of them - and therefor any arguments based on that false fact are also false. Because we're all human - all groups of humans are governed by the same, natural, psychological, and spiritual laws. To say that one side in a conflict is evil, beyond compromise, etc... (the most common argument when trying to justify war - one you've implied and others like you have directly stated) goes against all sociological, psychological and anthropological understanding of human beings.
Posted by Jeremy Keith Hammond on 03/07/2009 @ 03:54PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree with those who give credit to Israel and the Jewish people for the major contributions they have made to western civilization. As we saw in Nazi Germany, scientific, technological, and philosophical advancement does not prevent moral abominations.When will the human occupants of this planet learn that punishment is not an effective way to change people's behavior? It creates the opposite effect, making victims of people and creating a growing snowball of violence, enmity, and revenge.Just as Israeli violence against Palestinians motivates more Palestinian violence against Israelis, economic sanctions against Israelis, many of whom oppose the occupation and oppression of the captured territories is unlikely to lead to an atmosphere where peace is created.I don't know how or if it is possible to end the worldwide cycle of violence that threatens to bankrupt our governments and possibly destroy (the myth of) civilization. The best thing I have seen so far is for leaders of governments to TELL THE TRUTH about what is happening and change the atmosphere of lies, rhetoric, and secrecy that supports government and other terrorist violence.Unfortunately, when leaders like former president Carter and presidential contender Dennis Kucenich told the truth in public they were marginalized. I wonder if President Obama could survive telling the truth and practicing the government transparency he promised in his election campaign. I'm hoping he will give it a try.
Posted by Paco Despacio on 03/07/2009 @ 11:24AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
It isn't just Israeli violence against Palestinians that motivates Palestinian violence, it's also the impunity with which Israelis carry out their violence. There is no mechanism for justice for Palestinians. There is no honest court to which they can take their grievances for redress.
The same doesn't hold for Palestinian violence against Israelis. Besides the relatively few it arrests and imprisons for violent resistance, and those the P.A. arrests on Israel's behalf, it punishes the whole of the people (and justifies it because, they say, all Palestinians are complicit in the Hamas crimes, and Israel is noble). Israel routinely punishes Palestinians for even civil disobediance or non-violent action against Israeli expansion and confiscation of land, it punishes them for simply living on land Israel wants for that expansion (that's noble, I guess).
While I agree violence doesn't help, just what do you propose as an alternative to boycott, divestment and sanctions? People know the truth, those that are interested and at all open-minded, but the liars lie more loudly. Obama probably know it too, but there is no sign that he'll lead the US towards a more fair Mid-east policy, one that doesn't support Israeli/zionist racism.
Posted by Lyn McKuen on 03/08/2009 @ 02:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Lyn,
Utter nonsense. It is the Arab states who have kept the Palestinian people separate and unequal all these years. There is no other place in the world where a displaced people were kept in camps and hovels for decades without being assimilated into surrounding countries of their own people.
The many Palestinians who would love peace are still suffering because of radical Muslims who refuse to accept an Israeli State.
The Palestinians must stop the lunatics in order to save themselves. The uneven kill ratio is a tool of the terrorist to draw world condemnation on Israel. The many suckers who buy into it are being joined by the Jew haters of east and western Europe and now America.
Boycotting a country that defends itself is both pointless and wrong.
Posted by James Thompson on 03/08/2009 @ 04:41PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Clearly, many innocent Palestinians have been killed. Clearly, many innocent Israels have been killed. I doubt any of the "Israel apologists" [sic] would deny both of those facts. But let's not beat around the bush about Palestinian complicitness in Hamas' crimes - they voted a terrorist group "into office." And indeed, Israel is complicit in some terrible things against the Palestinians as well. However, Israel is still noble for many other reasons, not least its magnificent and unending contributions to the world. We probably would be in a sort of technological dark age - it would definitely not resemble the age of technology we're in now at least - without Israel. If you're looking to lay blame for the death of innocent Palestinians, look no further than first at their "government," Hamas, which "governs" them with fear and terror and doesn't have the interest of the people in mind in the slightest. If they would stop trying to indiscriminately kill Israeli civilians, they would suddenly find no more of their own civilians being killed as forced into the way by the traitors Hamas.
It's disappointing that my donation to change.org has gone toward supporting this kind of thinking as well, that of "how can we boycott Israel?" What an ignorant, misguided plea. How about a boycott of change.org?
Posted by Jared Scheib on 03/07/2009 @ 01:59PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Jared, you're welcome to boycott change.org if you want, but it means your point of view gets lost from the thread. That's a little like refusing to talk to Hamas because you don't like what they say. It doesn't help you get to resolution.
Posted by Gladys Tiffany on 03/07/2009 @ 02:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
AB G,
I am not from the Middle East. I have visited twice, and both times was utterly appalled at the separate and unequal treatment of Palestinians by Israelis. Separate and much more onerous security requirements, inability to get building permits while Israelis build settlements wherever they please, fewer educational and employment opportunities. In short, Palestinians are being dehumanized in the hopes they'll just go away. Sound familiar? Apartheid, no matter what language. Ask the group of Israeli soldiers who have refused to serve in the occupation for moral reasons. Ask the Israelis who demonstrate for equal rights.
As for the "gifts" to civilization, they were all paid for by US taxdollars. Israel is not capable of supporting itself without us, and that makes it a welfare state oppressing another people. Why you aren't ashamed is beyond me.
Posted by J T on 03/07/2009 @ 04:07PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
JT,
You underestimate the ability of Jews. We have survived your determination to destroy our country with nonsense accusations and simplification of very complex situation. But you are not interested in the truth.
Israel would do just fine without the money, thank you. Foolish threats that leave us no where. It may be your wet-dream that Israel cease to exist but if that ever became a possibility then you my friend will also would find yourself under a mushroom cloud.
Posted by s o on 03/07/2009 @ 11:00PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Oh yes, the biggest reason apartheid is the accurate word? THE WALL. Moral people do not wall out others while taking their land in the process. Requiring people to go through irregularly-monitored checkpoints so they often can't get to work or school is just more dehumanization. Just imagine that wall in any other democratic country. It would never be allowed to happen today. Israel has been given a pass to behave abominably, because they've browbeaten the world into treating them as special. No country is above the laws of humanity.
Posted by J T on 03/07/2009 @ 04:17PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Sorry but not completely true. This is an exaggeration. the FENCE makes up 85% of the not completed barrier and the rest or the WALL is near populated area of Jerusalem ............most of the area is not in-dispute making it a problem and cutting off fields. That is being addressed. BTW, most of the barrier follows the old 67' border with Jordan.
And yes it has stopped TERRORIST activities in Israel as a result. Saving Jewish lives are worth the discomfort until something better results.
Please, Israel is the last country in the world that has been given a pass. look around you for god sake and open your eyes.
You see dehumanization. I see saving lives. Hmm.
Posted by s o on 03/07/2009 @ 10:56PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
1000s of innocent people have been killed since the wall was built. Hmm, why is it no surprise that you only favor saving Jewish lives? Hmm, what is the definition of racist? Hmm, someone who dehumanizes persons of a particular ethnic group? E.g., implies that it's OK to kill innocent people as long as they're Palestinian? Or first require permits for Palestinians to live in their own homes, deny they're relatives who live elsewhere permission to visit them, then expel Palestinians from their villages on the "Israeli" side of the barrier? Which is what Israel is trying to do.
And why do you think Israel has a "right" to expel anyone from their homes, or deny them their right to work their land, visit their relatives, doctors, or whatever? Or torture and imprison them for protesting this?
Israel could protect its citizens simply by allowing Palestinians their free human rights. The only reason they've taken to violence is because they have very valid grievances, note: years of murder, massacres, torture, suppression of political expression, years of continued confiscation of land and expulsion, which of course racists who say only saving Jewish lives is important deny (because according to them it's OK to murder and exile the native Palestinians, they aren't Jewish and therefore have no right to live in their own homes) and dehumanize the victims, that is, permit them to be killed with impunity. That's the Israeli practice and historically zionist policy.
Posted by Lyn McKuen on 03/07/2009 @ 11:32PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hi Steve,Are you willing to question your fantasy that people who criticize the actions of the Israeli government hate Israel?Israelis should be especially aware of the racist nature of walls since the Jews in European cities were forced to live behind ghetto walls by the Catholic church for centuries. What did the church claim they were protecting their people from? The anti-semitic stereotypes the church was spreading. My grandmother, who lived in a ghetto as a child told me that periodically the priests would preach an anti-semitic sermon and the gangs of Polish Catholics would go into the ghetto and attack the people and homes there. Does this resemble anything happening currently?Semites are defined in the english dictionary as Arabs an Jews. An anti-semite is defined as someone prejudiced or hostile toward Jews. What about Arabs? The US and Israeli rhetoric against Arabs uses some of the same stereotypes and behaviors as the old European anti-semites used against the Jews. Anti-semitism is still alive and thriving, only redirected toward the Arab side of the semitic people.
Posted by Paco Despacio on 03/08/2009 @ 10:14AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hi Paco,
I have never said that peolpe who criticize Israeli policy hate Israel. I have no idea whats in the minds of others. But when you play the Antisemitic game of bait and switch this is where I let you stand alone.
Posted by s o on 03/08/2009 @ 10:37AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Paco, It is silly to compare a people being walled in because of their race and religion to a people who are walled APART because they allow their people to strap on bombs and blow up bus loads of children and shoppers in markets, or sneak out after dark to gun down or blow up any target the choose, military or civilian. The entire world walls in its criminals but the Palestinians do not so they are walled apart. What choice is there? Bottom line is still if the Muslims stop the killing and control their criminals the wall comes down and peace returns. Simple.
Posted by James Thompson on 03/08/2009 @ 10:46AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Steve, Did it take you long to go through your label collection to find the labels "Antisemitic" and "bait and switch" that you directed at my comments? I invite you to wonder what, if anything, is their relationship to reality?
Posted by Paco Despacio on 03/08/2009 @ 12:22PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
James,Are you saying that a Palestinian person who straps on a bomb and attacks Israelis is a criminal while an Israeli who sends missiles, or fires tank shells into densely populated Palestinian cities, or prevents medical supplies from reaching ill and gravely wounded Gaza occupants is not? If killing civilian non-combatants is criminal, then both sides need to control their criminals. Look at the numbers. And you call my thinking silly in three consecutive redundant posts? Wake up! Your inconsistent prejudiced partisan kind of thinking is prolonging the killing. If both sides wait for the other side to do right, the conflict will grow worse as more people will be drawn to violence after losing their loved ones to the other side's violence. The military strategies have been tried for decades and do not work. I'm ready for a different approach.
Posted by Paco Despacio on 03/08/2009 @ 12:03PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Paco, Read your comment, apply my response, it's really self explanatory. I posted the comment once. Your response to Steve seems to be posted 4 times as well, so perhaps there is some glitch with the site.
All rational people hope for the killing to stop but that has served no purpose these last 6 decades. Israel can't stop defending itself because we want the killing to cease.
Posted by James Thompson on 03/08/2009 @ 12:42PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Dear WebmasterEarlier I opted to get email notification of responses to the thread I posted on. As my mailbox fills up with these notifications I would like to opt out of email notification and just check the thread myself. How do I do that?Thanks.
Posted by Paco Despacio on 03/08/2009 @ 12:26PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
How about speaking up against Hamas' human rights abuses and war crimes by firing rockets indiscrimately into civilian areas and terrorizing innocent Israelis. Or their use of human shields and cynical "Pallywood" productions where they put on acts for the media and inflate the number of dead or wounded, it is sickening. Why aren't these "progressives" denouncing Hamas? Instead, it is always Israel's fault, blame Israel for everything. I ask you, what would you do if Canadians were lobbing missiles into your community and calling for your destruction? Would you sit there and take it while the international community stays silent? Please.
Posted by Josh Marks on 03/08/2009 @ 08:47PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I don't know what I'd do if Canadians were lobbing missiles or sending suicide bombers into my community. I have never been in that position. It must feel terrible. Whatever I think I'd do now would probably change if I was really in that situation.Maybe I'd inquire about my role in creating a situation where the Canadians were taking such desperate measures with such terrible consequences. If there was something I could change in my behavior without compromising my integrity, I hope I'd try that first.Maybe I'd build a wall around Canada, kill a hundred Canadians for every American that died, blockade the country, assassinate their leaders, destroy their homes, industries, churches and farms, take their land away and refuse to talk with their elected leaders if I thought that was the only to protect myself. Perhaps I would drive the Canadians off their land and force them to flee to England and France. This strategy does not have a good track record when it has been used. From my current perspective I don't think it would stop the missile attacks.About your request that I speak up against Hamas' human rights abuses, I'll respectfully refuse. If you want to write about it, I will probably read it and inquire about what is true or not in what you are saying and ask myself why are you saying it.I am against all human rights abuses and killing of civilians. As a citizen of the United States I think it is my duty to speak out against the war crimes that my government sponsors and supports. As the son and grandson of zionists, I want to see Israel live up to the highest standards of human conduct and the ideals and visions of some of the original zionists and live in peace with their semitic neighbors. I don't claim to be righter or better than anyone. I don't know what I'd do if I were in the predicament of the Israelis or the Palestinians. I am subject to the same human weaknesses and strengths that we all share. I'm getting tired of the polemical adversarial tone of this discussion. I believe that open hearted dialogue, not self righteous argument is the path to a solution.
Posted by Paco Despacio on 03/08/2009 @ 10:40PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Israel has always defended or tried to defend their citizens from Muslim terrorists. Anyway, a boycott only affects the average working people with little or no effect on the authorities.
Posted by Otto VonAuchvetter on 03/12/2009 @ 08:45PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
There's one single reason that proves you wrong: when the boycott campaign against South Africa's Apartheid started, there was no single reason why it was obvious it would work. It took over 20 years, but it WORKED all right. Less than four years after the Palestinian BDS Call, it can claim achievements that took far more time in the South African case. This is because the struggle for peace takes place under the new media order, in which cold war players can no longer control what we get to know. Maybe you would like a comfortable path to "peace in the middle east". There's no such thing for a people threatened by ever increasing ethnic cleansing. Boycott is a means, not an end, and it will keep on growing until international solidarity effectively challenges Northern countries despicable support of Apartheid against Palestinian people. Good hearted blogs won't.
Posted by ANMCLA Palestina on 03/29/2009 @ 04:39PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I have a great idea. Instead of a boycotting Israel, a democracy which respects women rights, gay rights, minority rights and has the most humane army in the world. How about boycotting Saudi Arabian products, an anti-democratic country where women and gays have little to no rights and which uses their oil money to fund radical Wahabbiast Islam madrassahs from Pakistan to Virginia. The same maddrassahs that recruit young men to become suicidal/homicidal terrorist murderers and gives these young men a poisinous mindet to hate the West.
So my idea: Stop using Middle Eastern oil! Stop buying gaz guzzling cars and join the green revolution!
Posted by Josh Marks on 03/30/2009 @ 02:07PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.