How To Sound Like a Humanitarian Expert in Three Easy Steps
Published October 07, 2009 @ 10:48PM PT

Someone once told me that there's nothing cheaper than expertise. Apparently what she meant was that it's always possible to hire an expert. I understood her words of wisdom somewhat differently -- that whereas real expertise might be a rare commodity, sounding like an expert isn't all that difficult.
To that end, three simple rules for sounding like an expert on the poverty-stricken, war-torn country of your choice:*
1. Memorize the names of various tribes and semi-obscure towns. Ask questions like: "But what do the [insert name of random tribal group] think?" Or "What about the situation in [semi-obscure town]?"
Both of which are best said with a thoughtful expression, verging on concerned. There's nothing like seeming to agree with your interlocutor while subtly pointing out that his or her analysis is rather facile for ignoring said tribe or district.
2. Memorize the date of one significant or semi-significant event in the country's history. Tie all current political and / or military developments back to that date: "You make an interesting point about Liberian politics, but it's all really just an outgrowth of what happened on September 9th, 1990."
Don't deign to explain further; instead, act as tho of course everyone should know what happened in Liberia on September 9th, 1990.
3. Acronyms, acronyms, acronyms. Saying you dislike the Sudanese Government is one thing, but doesn't really separate you from the crowd. Saying you dislike the NCP is better. Extra points if you can work NCP, SPLM, GNU and HAC into one semi-coherent sentence.
*It goes without saying that the appearance of expertise is quite different from, say, actual knowledge.
[Photo from alancleaver_2000's photostream on flickr]
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Heretical Thoughts
-
Anything Can Begin to Seem Normal After A While
-
A Not-Boring, Quite Different Aid Worker Reading List
Comments (11)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















This reminds me of when I was having a Bell with the VMT at AFEX in Rumbek after January 9 2005 and wondering about the Bor and the Murle...
Posted by Ben Parker on 10/08/2009 @ 05:25AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Laughing - always good to know how the CPA is playing in Jonglei
Posted by Michael Bear on 10/08/2009 @ 02:02PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
In step #2 you can substitute obscure language and/or obscure cultural trivia for historical/political trivia. "... your idea would probably work, except for the fact that the upland Akah are patrilineal/matrilocal and practice clan endogamy..." or, "... but the real problem with that strategey is that it fails to consider the concept of 'dao duc' as manifest in modern Vietnamese society..."
Then roll your eyes and forever after blow off those sub-humans foolish enough to admit to not knowing what you just said...
Posted by Tales From the Hood on 10/08/2009 @ 02:07PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Even better if you just make up said cultural trivia - "of course, everyone knows the role that Icelandic sagas have played in Acholi oral tradition. If you actually took the time to long into it, you'd see why your DDR strategy is fundamentally flawed."
Posted by Michael Bear on 10/08/2009 @ 02:18PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
hahaha, awesome post
Posted by Michael A. Weber on 10/09/2009 @ 11:01AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Say, "I think we need to take a step back for a moment" just when a meeting is getting something done, OR, "I think that this approach might be too much from a Western perspective", no matter what the approach being discussed is. Any use of the word "rubric" is also good.
Posted by Jayne Cravens on 10/10/2009 @ 02:54PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I prefer to problematize myself. And, I wish I could make a decision, but unfortunately I have to refer this conversation back to headquarters.
Posted by Michael Bear on 10/11/2009 @ 01:07PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
4. Name-drop people you know (or pretend to know) from different UN agencies and INGOs? :)
Posted by Jessan Catre on 10/10/2009 @ 09:54PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Brilliant
Posted by Michael Bear on 10/11/2009 @ 01:07PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
It was an eye opener for me after reading Mountains beyond Mountains by Tracy Kidder, that I was one of those informed but not very proactive liberal "do gooders". I have since become a very involved community volunteer and now can put my money where my mouth is!
If you do want to hone up on your Sudanese acronyms, try reading the Sudan Tribune! The comments are really enlightening.
Posted by Kathy DiPangrazio on 10/22/2009 @ 05:21PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
wonderful
Posted by Caitlyn Nason on 11/02/2009 @ 02:35PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.