War and Peace

Iran, Hamas and the Palestinian Problem: A Public Service Announcement

Published March 11, 2009 @ 04:21AM PT

Public Service Announcement:

Did you know that the conflict between Jews and Arabs in Israel/Palestine has been going on for more than 100 years? That may strike some as a surprise. After all, Iran has only been hostile to Israel since 1979. Hamas has only existed since 1988. Iran and Hamas have only been close for a few years. So why do some people claim that Iran is responsible for Israel's security dilemma?

It's simple! They want an excuse to crush the Palestinians while portraying them as mere agents of a foreign power. They want to take the violence of today and rip it apart from the long-term political context. They want to make it more difficult for those with a casual, short-term interest in the region to really understand what is going on.

The talking point strategy has two components, both designed to prevent negotiations with Hamas. Point 1: Don't talk about the Palestinian problem, talk about Hamas violence. Point 2: Don't talk about Hamas violence, talk about Iran as a strategic threat.

So kids, the next time your friend starts talking about 'Iran' to deflect attention from the occupation, siege of Gaza, human rights violations, racism and aggressive and illegal settlement policy, just say: "That's silly!" and tell them to remove AIPAC junk food from their diet. It's bad for you, and likely to induce violence and suffering.

Thank you for your time.

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (24)

  1. Jeremy Keith Hammond

    Enter alarmist rebuttal stage right:

    Posted by Jeremy Keith Hammond on 03/11/2009 @ 06:18AM PT

  2. Michael Ross

    Then how do you explain the verbal attacks on Israel coming from Iran, this in no invention of the Israeli mind?

    And why are they building and testing ballistic missiles that cost millions, you don't build those kind of rockets for conventional warheads?

    Why has Iran completed last year a massive military exercise designed to protect their nuclear installations if they are for solely for energy production?

    I can go on, but you get drift, this is no scare tactic, this a real existential threat to Israel, to the security of the oil producing countries in the ME, Europe and eventually the US.

    Why are Egypt and Saudi Arabia requesting nuclear energy producing plants now, are they also paranoid?

    Posted by Michael Ross on 03/11/2009 @ 06:43AM PT

  3. Jeremy Keith Hammond

    Right on queue. Those are excellent questions, Michael - but I don't think the answers are what you're implying them to be. 

    Posted by Jeremy Keith Hammond on 03/11/2009 @ 06:48AM PT

  4. Michael Ross

    Jeremy lets assume Iran is a real threat, how do you recommend Israel deal with this threat?

    Posted by Michael Ross on 03/11/2009 @ 06:58PM PT

  5. Reply to thread
  6. Michael Ross

    I am predictable in defending Israel, so what in your mind are the answers, other than the obvious?

    Posted by Michael Ross on 03/11/2009 @ 06:53AM PT

  7. Jeremy Keith Hammond

    It would behoove you to seek that out on your own because either out of spite, determination, jingoism or whatever - I don't believe anyone here could convince you and I'm done trying. You're here at change.org to defend Israel at whatever cost and the only thing I can do is to point that out for readers.

    Posted by Jeremy Keith Hammond on 03/11/2009 @ 07:04AM PT

  8. s o

    Jeremy,  that answer is a bit demeaning. Michael asks you for a response and you decide to prejudge him. It appears that you do not really have a formed opinion about what concerns Michael regarding Iran and the current situation.

    Just because he has an understanding and a appreciation of Israel's needs and concerns  doesn't put him beyond the pale.

    If you are serious then share your opinion and let's dialogue. Isn't that why there is a "post comment" component?
    Steve

    Posted by s o on 03/11/2009 @ 08:33AM PT

  9. Jeremy Keith Hammond

    "Michael asks you for a response and you decide to prejudge him."

    I have had enough conversations with Michael about Gaza to have developed a sufficient understanding of where he stands on the issue and the methods he uses to argue. Those methods themselves are dangerous because they are distracting and misleading and I'm attempting to point out the fallacies for other people since Michael has demonstrated he is incapable of realizing they exist and forming better arguments.


    "Just because he has an understanding and a appreciation of Israel's needs and concerns  doesn't put him beyond the pale."


    This is a gross attempt to make ME look bad by putting words in my mouth. I have not said that Michael has a valuable understanding and appreciation (infact the more he writes, the more I'm convinced the opposite) - nor did I use that as evidence that he is "beyond the pale." This is a stupid argument - which is probably why you're putting it in my mouth.


    "If you are serious then share your opinion and let's dialogue. Isn't that why there is a "post comment" component?"


    I'm most definitely serious - but I'm tired of Michael's red herrings. I've presented serious propositions and analysis in a rational manner and he has consistently either ignored me (usually), changed the subject (frequently) or dismissed what I've had to say as trite and invaluable - while at the same time wrapping it up in a pretty package calling my "thoughts" philosophical and beautiful as if it makes him look like a reasonable and open-minded man. His rigidity is more revealing.

    Posted by Jeremy Keith Hammond on 03/11/2009 @ 09:07AM PT

  10. s o

    Jeremy, This is a rather slow site and you need patience when you click post comment. I have learned the hard way. I did not put any words in your mouth. I have my own mouth to deal with let alone someone elses.

    The difficulty on this site is that there only a few people that  have any real understanding or experience in the Middle East. Everyone has opinions, some even passionate. But this arena is filled with complexity. Noth in Israel and with the Palestin leadership let alone the rest of the neighborhood. Nothing is as it appears in this part of the world. What is said in Ramallah, Gaza and or Jerusalem is often multi-layered. This is part of the general culture not experienced in the US of A.

    Force, power and dominance is unfortunately what the Arab leadership respects most highly. This is part of the cultural outlook. Israel doesn't respond to an attack and/or provocation and the next day on TV in Gaza, Ramallah Tehran the headline is about the "Zionist enemy and its loss of courage and its weakness of will." That is the Middle East and that is what makes any settlement very complex and intricate in addressing.

    It is easy to say to Israel just go back to 67 and all will be well. But as we have seen with leaving Gaza it aint necessarily so.

    Posted by s o on 03/11/2009 @ 09:28AM PT

  11. s o

    sorry but some of my words were cut off.

    Posted by s o on 03/11/2009 @ 09:29AM PT

  12. A N

    "Force, power and dominance is unfortunately what the Arab leadership respects most highly. This is part of the cultural outlook."
    Cultural outlook of whom? "The Arabs"?

    Posted by A N on 03/11/2009 @ 10:55AM PT

  13. Reply to thread
  14. Michael Ross

    You have tried, but not been convincing, Israel can and has made mistakes, but nothing like the gross mistaking mentioned here.

    The whole US and Israeli community are convinced of Iran's culpability, including the UN, regarding their nuclear ambitions, so you don't have a chance and you know it, this is just a conversation piece, and I don't mind, an intellectual exercise for me.

    Posted by Michael Ross on 03/11/2009 @ 07:33AM PT

  15. s o

    BTW, Who wrote this nonsense anyway? It sounds like a childish prank with tongue in cheek. The only problem is that for those of us LIVING here it is anything but. Then again it is easy to make light of our human tragedy when you are living in Phili for example.

    Posted by s o on 03/11/2009 @ 08:38AM PT

  16. Jeremy Keith Hammond

    There are disadvantages trying to see the forest from the trees. While your closeness to the conflict has it's value and uses - so does being from a distance. If I'm wrong about the Gaza situation - it's not because I live in the United States.

    Posted by Jeremy Keith Hammond on 03/11/2009 @ 09:15AM PT

  17. s o

    While it is true that if one can SEE it matters little where they may be living. However, living in the center of the "action" and knowing that the margin of error is limited and your families life is at stake no has have the luxury of failure.

    Posted by s o on 03/11/2009 @ 11:05AM PT

  18. Jeremy Keith Hammond

    I come here to talk about peace as a solution - instead of just the end game. It's easy to accuse those of us who are commited to non-violence of just... standing by and putting up with the violence commited by others. Or if you're more clever, you'll say that it's more dangerous because the former is harder to prove. I'd say fighting back is pretty dangerous too, though. Closing the proximity between you and the enemy. Risking retaliation should you fail. 

    In the end - when faced with an enemy - you can choose to fight back - or you can find a way to resist/avoid them non-violently. Both scenarios are dangerous. Life is at risk in either case. Neither method will guarantee that you'll live or die. So if you're not sure what the outcome will be (and no one can be SURE) - why not choose the one method that doesn't involve commiting violence yourself? Violence, which no matter how much you think it's ok under certain circumstances - is still unfortunate. 

    You're absolutely right, the margin of error is SO sickeningly slim - and that's what makes the decision so hard. Both options take a lot of courage. 

    How do I make the decision? I look to the past. I try to see how many times violence succeeded and compare it to how many times non-violence succeeded. There's been a lot of violence in human history - more so the further you go back (signs of progress? signs of a direction we may be going towards?) - but compared to the number of times non-violence solved a conflict - violence is dwarfed. There are many more countries that live in peace than those that go to war. There are many more neighbors who share cups of sugar and milk, than kill the others' dogs. 

    From my digging, non-violence has a much better track record... so when I'm faced with danger, and the options are to strike back or... do something else... anything else.... I'm going to play the odds.

    Posted by Jeremy Keith Hammond on 03/11/2009 @ 01:07PM PT

  19. Charles Lenchner

    Steve, do you watch Israeli television? Or listen to the radio? The satire over there is incredible... from the old Hartzufim to Eretz Nehederet, nothing you'll see here even comes close.

    To suggest that living in Israel makes a person somehow more careful not to be flip is just.... wrong. I've seen comedy skits on Israeli TV making fun of war widows and Holocaust survivors for crying out loud. NOTHING is sacred over there.

    Posted by Charles Lenchner on 03/11/2009 @ 04:46PM PT

  20. s o

    Hi Charles,
    I agree nothing is sacred in the public realm of entertainment and talk radio. Criticism of our own political, social and religious leaders is second to none. We can be incredible severe in our jabs.

     However, this should not be confused with the daily life  we lead. I meet with some of the most wonderful and amazing visionaries living here and speak with the cross-section of three generations. None that I know of confuse their often fierce criticism of Israeli policies, right and left, for the reality of life being a bit more tenuous living here.

    I think that if you had lived here raising a family you would appreciate this point.

    Israelis generally love life and live it sometimes with amazing  energy. But this tenuousness also forms the character of our people. Often with an outcome that expresses itself in overly self-indulgent, aggressive and self-assured behavior. Over-the-top bluster with an underlying anxiety. It is wonderful living here because the country is multi-cultural and living in the "here and "now" is most evident when stopping to smell the flowers.

    We have raised three children in Israel and I must say that I have no regrets as to how they turned out. They are very much integrated into the society but having also lived in the States they appreciate the special blessing of "safety" that the US generally affords the average inhabitant.

    But I do think we must be careful not to confuse over-the-top satire for a lack of respect. Laughing at one-self is a bit different then dis-respecting each other. The warmth of friendship and camaraderie in Israel is second to none from anywhere else that I have been fortunate to visit and to live in the world.

    Posted by s o on 03/12/2009 @ 12:00AM PT

  21. Reply to thread
  22. D Spicer

    When isreal wants peace they'll pull out of Palistinian land. Granted it was all their land before it was stolen, however, If isreal wants any chance at it theyll need to pull out of the land they "gave" to palestine after the invasion

    Posted by D Spicer on 03/13/2009 @ 01:18PM PT

  23. Mary Richards

    Gave to the Palestinians?   It was never theres to give.  If Israel ever wants peace then they need to give the Palestinians - all 3.5 million of them - a peaceful life without sanctions and without restrictions.   Isrealis are the occupiers in the West Bank - it is not their land and they need to get out of there - or give the Palestinians full democratic rights to vote, work, travel, and get educated.  Why didn't Israel give the West Bank and the Gaza to the Palestinians back in the '70's when they were first told they should?  Building settlements all those years was hardly a peaceful move. 

    The announcement at the top of this page makes perfect sense but as usual Michael Ross plays the savior of Israel and the topic never gets fully discussed.  Michael Ross has ruined so many discussions on all these Middle East topics.   One response from him should be plenty - we all know his views no matter what the current topic. 

    Progress means change.   Change is what Obama is about.

     

    Posted by Mary Richards on 03/13/2009 @ 03:04PM PT

  24. Mary Richards

    Steve - this is a website for supporters of Barack Obama - I think you are on the wrong website.   If you don't support change and if you find Michael Ross' comments as enlightening or as a step toward real peace in the mideast, then you are not helping your Israel.   To see the US position toward Israel as in need of a changeis not anti-Israel - it is realistic.   Why do Israeli's feel the need to infiltrate US websites?  I don't see Palestinians, Iranians, or Iraqis on  this site.   I would not hesitate to say that US has been making BIG mistakes and needs to change - If Israel was a real democracy, you and Ross would not be afraid to point out Israel's weaknesses - you are both too defensive to be credible.  If you can't criticize your own country, then you have no right criticizing mine.

    Posted by Mary Richards on 03/13/2009 @ 06:03PM PT

  25. s o

    Mary,

    If you would READ what I wrote then you wouldn't even make the suggestions just pronounced by you. Also, get one thing straight, YOU do not own this site. If the owner wants to stifle free speech then he/she will cut us off.

    The last time I looked the name of the site was change.org The problem here is you are not interested in dialogue. All you want is for someone to agree with your faulty logic and seriously flawed look at reality.

    Israel IS a REAL Democracy. No one, especially a flawed observer such as yourself is going to change that notion.

    I also do not see any where on this site that says that only supporters of Obama need apply.

    When you find it in your warm heart to critique your foolish comments about Me and Mr. Ross then I will be more then pleased to share my criticism of Israeli policy. One thing we have in this Democracy is FREEDOM to brutally display our displeasure at our political leaders. If anything your display of putting your leader beyond reproach as  the MESSIAH turns you into a Fascist.

    Posted by s o on 03/14/2009 @ 03:48AM PT

  26. s o

    Mary,

    If you would READ what I wrote then you wouldn't even make the suggestions just pronounced by you. Also, get one thing straight, YOU do not own this site. If the owner wants to stifle free speech then he/she will cut us off.

    The last time I looked the name of the site was change.org The problem here is you are not interested in dialogue. All you want is for someone to agree with your faulty logic and seriously flawed look at reality.

    Israel IS a REAL Democracy. No one, especially a flawed observer such as yourself is going to change that notion.

    I also do not see any where on this site that says that only supporters of Obama need apply.

    When you find it in your warm heart to critique your foolish comments about Me and Mr. Ross then I will be more then pleased to share my criticism of Israeli policy. One thing we have in this Democracy is FREEDOM to brutally display our displeasure at our political leaders. If anything your display of putting your leader beyond reproach as  the MESSIAH turns you into a Fascist.

    Posted by s o on 03/14/2009 @ 03:49AM PT

  27. Reply to thread

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
Charles Lenchner

Charles is a nonprofit professional with 20 years of experience working with nonprofit organizations in Israel, Palestine and the U.S. For the past few years, he's been specializing in online organizing.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.