Regionalize the Conflict

Published May 12, 2009 @ 05:49AM PT

Guest post by Ben Murane

Naomi Chazan, a leading Israeli peacenik and former Meretz MK, made an American tour recently to bolster support among American Jews for progressive causes in Israel. (She's presently President of the New Israel Fund.)

Fiery, witty and on the offensive, Chazan leapt immediately into the speculation about Bibi, Obama and a two state solution and made strict recommendations to Americans: regionalize the solution to the conflict.

Stupidity, she said, is repeating a failure while expecting different results. The Olso process failed and to simply hope that Israel and Palestine can be sweet talked back to the table may have worked eight years ago. But now with Iran influencing Hamas and Hezbollah, the conflict at home is tangled in wider problems. Obama, she says, has done the intelligent thing in dealing with Iran, Syria and the Palestinians together with Israel.

The hypocrisy of Israel's nuclear program existing unacknowledged alongside the battle against Iranian nuclear proliferation stings in the Arab world. Iran's funding of Hamas -- more hardline than the average Palestinian -- by outsiders scuttles diplomacy. Syria's complicity with Hezbollah (also aided by fundamentalists further afield than Lebanon) is the same. The interwoven influences demand addressing all of it or none of it.

It is also no longer reasonable to expect that Israel and Palestine will reach an amiable final status agreement. Not with Bibi Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman at the Israeli helm. Not with a neutered Abbas and recalcitrant Hamas divided on the Palestinian side. It may be time, Chazan suggested, for a serious non-military intervention by the international community. Meaning, America and the Quartet should force a settlement agreeable to both populaces upon their politicians. The is even a silver lining for politicians answering to outraged hardliners: "Hey, it's not my fault," they can claim, "the Americans made me do it!"

Furthermore, she said that such an imposed agreement (she didn't like that word and preferred -- "non-military diplomatic intervention") would necessarily be two states for two peoples. "I don't care what is said by otherwise very smart people in the pages of the New York Review of Books," she said with a smirk. "I am a real person, my country is real. The alternative to a two state solution is not a one state solution, it's more of what we have now, wars on the backs of civilians."

That said, she demanded an answer of American Jews: "You voted Obama by 78%...It's as if there's a total disconnect between the liberal values of American Jews and their attitude to Israel...Israel's existence is totally dependent on Israel's soul. An end to the discomfort." An end to the occupation of another people.

We need more progressive voices like Naomi Chazan. But we need there here, home grown in the U.S. of A. Be one.

[Want to be a guest poster? Send me snappy content!]

Share this Post

Comments (3)

Acknowledgement is the key to any resolution, Obama seems to do well in this area. This conflict has four major components; land claims, religious disparity, deep resentment from past battles, and the lack of commerce between the Palestinians and the Israelis. The latter is a key component that is often underestimated. Israel by culture resisted developing a sustainable and fair commerce with the Palestinians. If Obama helps find ways to move forward on this issue and encourage both parties to stick to their word, then there is hope for a resolution. Even profound resentment can be set aside over time if both parties have mutual economic interests. Japan and China have illustrated how time and economics can heal deep wounds.

Posted by R M on 05/13/2009 @ 10:09AM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
Reply to thread
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by R
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
What an utterly stupid idea-why,after America has tried time after time after time to impose a peaceful solution in the Middle East with the only successes of creating ever more turmoil in the aftermath of each successive effort, should it work this time? America has to learn that ultimately, there is no lasting peace between two parties unless they work it out between themselves. Only when America and other countries cease trying to force peace in the area will there be the slightest hope of it actually occuring.
See the letter that 328 members of the House and 72 Senators sent to Mr. Obama affirming the key peace principles for progress in the Middle East this past May-congress seems to understand this concept, at last.
However, given the statements Mr. Obama made in the "Cairo Speech" about America's stance on Israeli policy with the Palestinians, the president does not.

Posted by Imp Rimis on 06/11/2009 @ 12:16AM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- 1 person likes this comment. Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by Imp
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply
If you no longer can blog, can we please get someone else so that this cause can remain active?

Posted by S B on 07/02/2009 @ 05:08PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by S
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

Comment

Check Spelling

Email me when there are new posts to this thread
Comment Policy

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Charles is a nonprofit professional with 20 years of experience working with nonprofit organizations in Israel, Palestine and the U.S. For the past few years, he's been specializing in online organizing.