Sunni vs. Shia
Published October 05, 2008 @ 03:07PM PT
Remember back when John McCain let it slip that he didn’t know the difference between Sunni and Shia? While liberal elites snickered out loud, most folks shrugged: they don’t know either.
But we should!
Like Protestants and Catholics in Christianity, Sunnis and Shias are the main sects or branches of the Muslim community, and they share the core beliefs and practices of Islam. After the death of the prophet Muhammad – the founder of Islam – in 632 C.E., a struggle emerged within the nascent religious community. One faction supported the leadership of Ali, Muhammad’s cousin and brother-in-law, and the other supported those who became known as the Rashidun – the first four Caliphs . It was the latter faction which assumed control of the caliphate – the growing Islamic empire -- expanding the territory ruled by Muslims in the decades after Mohammed’s death.
In 680 C.E., there was a battle between the forces of Abu Bakr, who represented the official Caliphate and the followers of Ali. The word ‘Sunna’ means ‘the way’ reflecting adherence to orthodoxy. The opposition called themselves the Party of Ali, or ‘Shi’at Ali’, hence – the Shia, or Shi’ites. The battle ended badly for Ali’s forces; his son Hussein died, and many others were killed. The theme of a righteous few fighting against hopeless odds and martyring themselves is central to Shi’ite identity.
This story has replayed in various places and times, as the Sunni Muslims are more numerous and powerful; even when they are not more numerous, the Shia have still been poorer and politically weaker.
Sunni and Shia in Geopolitics:
Shias are the majority in only a few Muslim countries and are often seen as the underdogs elsewhere. In Saddam Hussein’s Iraq in particular the Shia were oppressed by the Sunni-dominated regime. In Lebanon, the Shia also felt marginalized, claiming they were denied their fair share of resources by the dominant Christian and Sunni communities.
But nearly half the population of the core of the Asian Middle East (Lebanon, Syria, Israel/Palestine, Jordan, Iraq, Iran and the Arabian Peninsula states) are Shia. Inspired partly by the Iranian Revolution, Shia in various countries have struggled more openly for political representation since 1979.
The Sunni-ruled countries of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia are all allies of the United States, and nervous about the rise of Shia power in the Middle East. Lebanon, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Oman all have Shia communities whose political ambitions would change the balance of power in those countries. It’s entirely possible that the 21st Century will see the Shia as the dominant branch of Islam in the Persian Gulf, including most of the reserves of Middle East oil.
Why Should We Care?
The media have been known to sensationalize the practices of some Shia, and they often play up the significance of the Sunni-Shia divide. In practice, it is hard to make overly broad generalizations about the two. Both communities are incredibly diverse, with conflict and cooperation often related to local conditions and historical relations rather than geo-politics. Seen from a distance, both Sunnis and Shia have a lot in common, and members of both sects often feel as though their religion is under attack from the West and in the West. Learning about Islam and showing respect towards its core beliefs is probably a better course of action than dwelling too much on the differences between Sunni and Shia.
Since 1979, observers in the West have often identified the wave of Islamism in the Middle East with the Iranian revolution. Elements within Iran (Revolutionary Guards) have been active in exporting “Islamic Revolution” in the past 3 decades, most notably in Lebanon, by supporting the Hezbollah against Israel. Since the second Intifada (2000), Iran has provided some help to the Palestinians. While Iran’s help for its Shia co-religionists in Lebanon was seen as legitimate, using its power to directly assist Palestinian groups is seen by some as undue interference in the Sunni part of the Middle East.
With the rise of (Sunni) al-Qaida and attacks of 9/11, the West has focused more extensively on Sunni religious extremists, notably the Salafist forces active in Afghanistan and Iraq. Those forces are also extreme in their hatred of Shia Islam, which they view as apostasy. This has created the awkward situation in which the US and Iran are often on the same side, fighting Sunni and Salafist forces. Iran and the US both supported the Northern Alliance, which defeated the Taliban and both countries support the Shia-led government in Iraq and both want to see the radical Sunni Salafists defeated.
Sunni and Shia beliefs at a glance:
Shia –only descendants of Mohammed should have led the Muslim community.
Sunni – early Shi’ites were wrong – the Caliphate established by after Mohammed’s death was legitimate.
Shia – the Mahdi, or hidden Imam, is a central figure in end times eschatology.
Sunni – nope!
Shia – leadership should be conferred on those who combine the revealed, legalistic aspects of religion, as well as the esoteric, spiritual side. Leaders are preferably, descendents of the prophet.
Sunni – mainstream focus on jurisprudence. Esoteric and mystical side represented by Sufism.
FAQ:
Q: In terms of religious practice, how different are Sunnis and Shia?
A: They are very similar. Most daily and annual activities are the same. Shia practice often involves an additional pro-Ali component.
Q: I’ve heard that the Shia have “odd” beliefs in comparison to the Sunnis. What might that refer to?
A: As a consequence of being persecuted, the Shia allow the practice of “Taqiya” or occultation. That means that it is sometimes permissible to hide one’s true beliefs. The Shia also allow for “temporary marriage,” a custom that is not common, and has been criticized for resembling prostitution.
Q: The original cult of Assassin’s was a Shi’ite sect.
A: True. They were called “Hashishiyun,” or “hash smokers.” Europeans pronounced it incorrectly, resulting in the word “assassin.” During the Crusades, a group of devoted religious warriors living in the Mountains of Lebanon struck terror throughout the Arab world by sending assassins to the courts of various princes and monarchs. This was the original “asymmetrical warfare” model, as the threatened princes found it near impossible to strike back, and the assassins themselves seemed to be unafraid of death. It’s important to remember that this group is marginal to the overall story of Shi’ite Islam.
Q: Both Sunni and Shia don’t agree on the separation of Mosque and State.
A: It’s a mixed bag. Throughout Muslim history, there has been a tension between rulers who have the blessing of religious leaders, but don’t want to be under a religious hierarchy. Within both Shia and Sunni communities there are long traditions arguing for greater and lesser involvement of religion in state affairs.
Share this Post
Related Posts
Comments (6)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















The section vs. Shia is a misrepresentation of historical, cultural and academic aspects of both the Islamic schools of thought. Instead of stating everything that has been wrongly stated above, I would just write what is more reasonable and acceptable to readers of both sects of Islam.
Literally, Shia means 'followers' implying 'followers of Ali' and Sunni means those who follow the tradition or tradition of Prophet as reported to them by the companions. Beliefs and practices of Sunnis and Shias differ in many ways although they perform many of the same religious obligations. The main dividing point is the issue of succession of the Prophet (peace be upon him).
Shias believe, based on their understanding of the Qur'an and the historical records, that Prophet Mohammad appointed a successor in his lifetime and did not leave the issue of succession in the hands of the people. This person, according to the Shia beliefs, was Ali the cousin and son-in-law of Mohammad who was the first one to announce his faith at the age of 10, and commanded almost all the battles of early Islam during the Prohet's life.
Sunnis believe that the Prophet did not appoint anyone as a successor and left the matter to be decided by the people after him. Thus they believe that the people had the choice in this matter and they point to the selection of Abu Bakr by a party of people, and silently accepted by the rest, as legimate.
Both have their arguments to support their own view.
The battle in the year 680 C.E. was between Yazid the Umayyid ruler and Hussain the grandson of Mohammad. Yazid demanded allegience from Hussain and threatened to kill him if he did not but Hussain refused to legitimize his authority which he believed was unlawful and tyrannical. Yazid plotted to kill Hussain during the pilgrimage or Hajj, and Hussain decided to leave Mecca a day before the pilgrimage began.
Hussain and other descendants of Prophet Mohammad were killed in a brutal and tragic event where the 30,000 strong army of Yazid denied water to Hussain's camp of 72 men, and their families that included women and children.
Shias emphasize on revelation and human intellect as two pillars of guidance and understanding. Taqiyyah or 'self-protection' means saving one's life when confronted with danger on the condition that it does not lead to destruction of Islam or Muslims.
It is an example of the natural human instinct of self-protection when life is at stake. Taqiyyah is not allowed when it leads to adandonment of rights of people or promotes injustice in any way.
Mut'a sometimes translated as 'temprory marriage' is provision within Quran according to Shia laws which allows a man and a woman to have time-bound relationship requiring a dower for the woman just like regular marriage and requiring the woman to wait for three months at the end of the period. If a child is born he or she is the responsibility of the father and will inherit from him. Woman in this kind of marriage is not a financial responsibility of the man unless documented earlier and during the relationship she does not have to seek the consent of the husband in order to go outside the house.
The section about Assassins being Shias is totally baseless.
Posted by Shamshad Haider on 11/10/2008 @ 01:29PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Thank you Shamshad for offering your understanding. I'm not a Muslim, Shia or Sunni, and clearly on sensitive ground when intereting other faiths.
Please note that everything I wrote could be found in multiple sources, on-line and off-line, from Muslim and Western authors. I did state regarding the Assassins that "it’s important to remember that this group is marginal to the overall story of Shi’ite Islam."
If you think I've made any factual errors - please show me a source that would help me understand not only where you thing I'm making a mistake, but where I can verify that this is the case. I would be happy to make corrections to this page.
Thank you! I welcome your participation on other issues/pages as well.
Posted by Charles Lenchner on 11/10/2008 @ 01:47PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
whether it is sunni or shia..it is the same.
muslims should wake up to a the threat of division, dividing muslims into groups hating each other based on no knowledge.
as a muslim, i strongly refuse to name myself after a group..i am a muslim..i submit to god's will and i will not have anyone call me another name.
whether there are differences between the two groups or not nothing changes the core fact that muslims (submitters to the will of god in English translation) bear witness that there is one god (Allah in Arabic) and that Prophet muhammad is his last messenger to earth.
there is no reason why muslims should keep the debate of whether the caliphate should go to Ali (god bless him) or not...LET US STUDY MORE IMPORTANT ISSUES AND STOP THE CRAP!
Posted by wurud jallad on 12/21/2008 @ 09:27AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
If we insist on ignoring our diversity as Shias and Sunnis like those whites who pretend to be color-blind, it would actually contribute to the violence against Shia minorities today. One will become part of this takfiri campagn to discredit Shia Muslims and their services to Islam today. One may be supporting the oppression and discrimination against them and also depriving oneself of the valuable knowledge received from Imam Ali and his family.
Posted by Shamshad Haider on 12/25/2008 @ 08:28AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I'm promoting an idea for creating lasting peace in the Middle East and the world. It still needs a lot of votes to make it into the second round. Please help provide a more hopeful vision and alternative to the endless spiral of violence escalating in the Middle East by casting your vote today. Thank you.
http://www.change.org/ideas/view/israel_as_cornerstone_for_a_future_united_states_of_earth
Posted by Eli Williamson-... on 12/29/2008 @ 09:00AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The first Earthpledge proposal wasn't as clear as it needed to be which caused some confusion. Please take a closer look at this hopeful vision and alternative to the endless spiral of violence escalating in the Middle East and cast your vote today. Thank you.
http://www.change.org/ideas/view/israel_as_cornerstone_for_a_future_united_states_of_earth
Also, please check out my friend Josep's proposal for human unity:
http://www.change.org/ideas/view/human_union
Posted by Eli Williamson-... on 12/30/2008 @ 08:21AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.